On 9/5/2013 11:53 AM, Andrew Deason wrote: > On Thu, 05 Sep 2013 11:34:33 -0400 > Jeffrey Altman <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I doubt that anyone has been tracking the git and buildbot software >> revisions as builders have been upgraded and replaced. > > We know what version of buildbot the slaves are running from here: > <http://buildbot.openafs.org:8010/buildslaves>. We would know the > version of git if we ran 'git version' in one of the build steps. > > And even if we get it wrong, it would be pretty obvious in a test run if > it's downloading the entire repo at the start of the build, and that can > be fixed accordingly. The situation right now is already broken.
It is now broken. Was it when we last performed this dance? I don't know. My point is that the rule that was selected was set on a per builder basis because of the different revisions on each build slave. If the revisions of buildbot and/or git changed without the build rules being updated, the breakage is not surprising.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
