On Thu, 05 Sep 2013 12:18:19 -0400 Jeffrey Altman <[email protected]> wrote:
> My point is that the rule that was selected was set on a per builder > basis because of the different revisions on each build slave. If the > revisions of buildbot and/or git changed without the build rules being > updated, the breakage is not surprising. Okay, so I think you were trying to answer my "why is it this way" question. I interpreted your original response instead as a reason to not change it. If that's incorrect, then okay, sorry. Interpreting your response as the latter: well okay, but that's not an answer. That doesn't answer "why are we passing -X?", and so that question still remains. From what I can see from the last discussion, using -X was the ideal; as in, that's what we used if there were no issues with git or buildbot versions. It looks like every build slave that has an explicit clean rule uses -X, with the sole exception of the rhel6 slave. -- Andrew Deason [email protected] _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
