Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 06:07:42PM +0100, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
BTW, I could be wrong, but I don't really see kernel-tree-specific
options in the generated makefile, apart build directory pathes that
could get easily made relatives. I tested against two different 2.6
The potential for differences exists as the kernel can change significantly
between minor releases.
The point is: how would it change, otherwise as inside the source code ?
If I ship a directory containing the following:
- the attached generated Makefile
- all .c files corresponding to the .o files inside
- the generated AFS_component_version_number.c file
- all referenced .h files
Would it be enough for building against any 2.6 kernel tree ?
--
Anything the Army says is man-portable, isn't
-- Murphy's New Military Laws n°15
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
