In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,Harald Barth wr ites: >> We use openafs clients on a lot of machines. The local Filesystems are >> usually reiser. But for the DiskCache we have to install one partition >> with ext2. > >To all my experience, reiserfs is broken. I recommend NOT to use that >file system. At all. As a cache file system ext2 is fine, because it
as i recall resiferfs doesnt work because it doesnt keep a fixed mapping between file objects and what afs would consider the inode. i believe people have been lucky with using a reisferfs cache filesystem but it had to be on a seperate partition. normally, its journaling that creates trouble for caching filesystems. personally, unless you have a need for massive amounts of cache, use memcache. search through the list archives for a better answers about this. this info doesnt appear to be in the wiki, so perhaps it needs one. (and one that is more correct than my vague ramblings). _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
