On Nov 29, 2007 3:34 PM, Jason Edgecombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> In my sordid saga to get a Sun fibre channel array working well with
> AFS, I found the following:
>
> When I upgraded the server to 1.4.5 namei, the fileserver would not
> mount the /vicep? partitions without doing a "touch
> /vicep?/AlwaysAttach" first. These are dedicated partitions on separate
> hard drives.
>
> I'm using a source-compiled openafs on solaris 9 sparc. openafs was
> compiled with the following options:
> CC=/opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc YACC="yacc -vd" ./configure \
>  --enable-transarc-paths \
>  --enable-largefile-fileserver \
>  --enable-supergroups \
>  --enable-namei-fileserver \
>  --with-krb5-conf=/usr/local/krb5/bin/krb5-config
>
> We're using MIT kerberos 1.4.1 on the clients & fileservers with a 1.6.xKDC
>
> # mount | grep vicep
> /vicepa on /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s6
> read/write/setuid/intr/largefiles/logging/xattr/onerror=panic/dev=1d80006
> on Thu Nov 29 13:03:15 2007
> /vicepd on /dev/dsk/c0t3d0s6
> read/write/setuid/intr/largefiles/logging/xattr/onerror=panic/dev=1d80016
> on Thu Nov 29 13:03:15 2007
> /vicepc on /dev/dsk/c0t2d0s6
> read/write/setuid/intr/largefiles/logging/xattr/onerror=panic/dev=1d8001e
> on Thu Nov 29 13:03:15 2007
> /vicepb on /dev/dsk/c0t1d0s6
> read/write/setuid/intr/largefiles/xattr/onerror=panic/dev=1d8000e on Thu
> Nov 29 13:03:15 2007
>
> # grep vicep /etc/vfstab
> /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s6       /dev/rdsk/c0t0d0s6      /vicepa ufs     3
> yes     -
> /dev/dsk/c0t1d0s6       /dev/rdsk/c0t1d0s6      /vicepb ufs     3
> yes     -
> /dev/dsk/c0t2d0s6       /dev/rdsk/c0t2d0s6      /vicepc ufs     3
> yes     -
>
> #cat SalvageLog
> @(#) OpenAFS 1.4.5 built  2007-11-28
> 11/29/2007 09:52:59 STARTING AFS SALVAGER 2.4 (/usr/afs/bin/salvager)
> 11/29/2007 09:52:59 No file system partitions named /vicep* found; not
> salvaged
>
> Does anyone know why this would be happening?
>
Probably a bug in the "what's acceptable as a vice partition" logic... which
I thought i fixed before 1.4.5; i bet i committed the wrong thing (because i
tested it)

Reply via email to