Derrick Brashear wrote: > > > On Nov 29, 2007 3:34 PM, Jason Edgecombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > Hi all, > > In my sordid saga to get a Sun fibre channel array working well with > AFS, I found the following: > > When I upgraded the server to 1.4.5 namei, the fileserver would not > mount the /vicep? partitions without doing a "touch > /vicep?/AlwaysAttach" first. These are dedicated partitions on > separate > hard drives. > > I'm using a source-compiled openafs on solaris 9 sparc. openafs was > compiled with the following options: > CC=/opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc YACC="yacc -vd" ./configure \ > --enable-transarc-paths \ > --enable-largefile-fileserver \ > --enable-supergroups \ > --enable-namei-fileserver \ > --with-krb5-conf=/usr/local/krb5/bin/krb5-config > > We're using MIT kerberos 1.4.1 on the clients & fileservers with a > 1.6.x KDC > > # mount | grep vicep > /vicepa on /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s6 > read/write/setuid/intr/largefiles/logging/xattr/onerror=panic/dev=1d80006 > on Thu Nov 29 13:03:15 2007 > /vicepd on /dev/dsk/c0t3d0s6 > read/write/setuid/intr/largefiles/logging/xattr/onerror=panic/dev=1d80016 > on Thu Nov 29 13:03:15 2007 > /vicepc on /dev/dsk/c0t2d0s6 > read/write/setuid/intr/largefiles/logging/xattr/onerror=panic/dev=1d8001e > > on Thu Nov 29 13:03:15 2007 > /vicepb on /dev/dsk/c0t1d0s6 > read/write/setuid/intr/largefiles/xattr/onerror=panic/dev=1d8000e > on Thu > Nov 29 13:03:15 2007 > > # grep vicep /etc/vfstab > /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s6 /dev/rdsk/c0t0d0s6 /vicepa ufs 3 > yes - > /dev/dsk/c0t1d0s6 /dev/rdsk/c0t1d0s6 /vicepb ufs 3 > yes - > /dev/dsk/c0t2d0s6 /dev/rdsk/c0t2d0s6 /vicepc ufs 3 > yes - > > #cat SalvageLog > @(#) OpenAFS 1.4.5 built 2007-11-28 > 11/29/2007 09:52:59 STARTING AFS SALVAGER 2.4 (/usr/afs/bin/salvager) > 11/29/2007 09:52:59 No file system partitions named /vicep* found; not > salvaged > > Does anyone know why this would be happening? > > Probably a bug in the "what's acceptable as a vice partition" logic... > which I thought i fixed before 1.4.5; i bet i committed the wrong > thing (because i tested it) > > Is it safe to run like this?
Should I file a bug? Jason _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info