Robert Banz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well, the issue was if you're using it on a server, and using what a lot > of people still consider the default (the inode fileserver), apocalyptic > dataloss may occur.
Oh, right, I completely forgot about that. > I would say that in addition to recommending people use logging with ufs > (or better, zfs!), that we should also push for deprecation of the inode > fileserver ;) I think it's generally a good idea to stick with one server implementation on all platforms since that way everyone runs the same (tested) code, but I seem to recall the migration from inode to namei is pretty heinous (as in you probably can't do it in place and need to bring up another server and move everything). -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
