For what it's worth, we've been using ZFS for our AFS partitions for many years now, and it's been rock solid. It's even saved our butts in a few situations where ZFS recovered far more gracefully than UFS would have. If you're using Solaris, I believe that there is no reason to use anything other than ZFS at this point.
Brian On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 02:53:52PM -0700, Patricia O'Reilly wrote: > I'm curious, what types of problems have you encountered with > ZFS? We are actually considering using ZFS on some of our fileservers. > > --patty > > Jeff Blaine wrote: > > We're considering ditching our Sun boxes with vice > > partitions on ZFS :( > > > > What's the tried-and-true production-quality Linux > > equivalent? Anything? Last I read, nothing. > > > > Barring an equivalent, what Linux setup... > > > > a) seems most stable > > b) is fsck-less > > > > Even quick grunt responses are appreciated. Thanks. > > _______________________________________________ > > OpenAFS-info mailing list > > OpenAFS-info@openafs.org > > https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info > _______________________________________________ > OpenAFS-info mailing list > OpenAFS-info@openafs.org > https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info -- Brian Sebby (se...@anl.gov) | Infrastructure and Operation Services Phone: +1 630.252.9935 | Computing and Information Systems Fax: +1 630.252.4601 | Argonne National Laboratory _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info