On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Ian Crowther <i.crowt...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I've got two 'practice' AFS servers that refuse to stop using > 10.1.2.0/24. I'm running 1.4.12.1+dfsg-4 on Debian. OpenAfs works > quite happily apart from this. > > vos listaddrs shows: > vos listaddrs > xantheose.example.com > b.ns.example.com > 10.1.2.17 > caffeine.example.com > a.ns.example.com > 10.1.2.16 > > (each of the 2 servers has 3 IPs; IPs with PTRs are on 10.1.0.0/24) > > My volumes look like: > > #vos listvol 10.1.0.144 > Total number of volumes on server 10.1.0.144 partition /vicepa: 5 > root.afs 536870915 RW 2 K On-line > root.cell 536870921 RW 4 K On-line > root.public 536870930 RW 3 K On-line > root.user 536870924 RW 3 K On-line > user.ian 536870933 RW 7323050 K On-line > > Total volumes onLine 5 ; Total volumes offLine 0 ; Total busy 0 > > #vos listvol 10.1.0.145 > Total number of volumes on server 10.1.0.145 partition /vicepa: 6 > root.afs.readonly 536870916 RO 2 K On-line > root.cell.readonly 536870922 RO 4 K On-line > root.public.readonly 536870931 RO 2 K On-line > root.public.readonly 536870928 RO 2 K On-line > root.user.readonly 536870925 RO 3 K On-line > user.ian.readonly 536870934 RO 10 K On-line > > Total volumes onLine 6 ; Total volumes offLine 0 ; Total busy 0 > > (not entirely sure why root.public.readonly appears twice) > > /var/lib/openafs/local/NetRestrict (/etc/openafs/ too, but at the > moment I'm concerned about the servers) contains a single line on both > servers: 10.1.2.255
that address doesn't appear in the list of addresses you showed. your choices are 1) use 10.1.2.16 to apply to that 2) use 10.255.255.255, the classful subnet address, in the file to apply to that. -- Derrick _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info