* Andrew Deason [2012-06-18 10:30:28 -0500]: > NetRestrict(5) still mentions that specifying 255 acts as a wildcard. > 80fc888a9223050481de932233fe7121a48df194 removed one mention of that, > but the other remains; should both of them have been removed?
That was the impression I got when I last looked at this (cf. #125340), yes. For the purposes of the present discussion, however, it's enough to notice that the remaining mention of 255 as a wildcard is in the "Client NetRestrict" section, so it doesn't apply anyway. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info