-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-11-07 11:09, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: > Hello, > > if I remember right, somebody wrote a few weeks ago, that with > 1.6.x the choices for the cache partition on Linux systems aren't > limited to ext2 only anymore. Is this correct?
Correct. > If yes, which filesystems are possible to use (which ones are not)? > Does the cache even need its own partition nowadays? Usual all FS are possible, some are useless (NFS e.g.). Would be interesting to see the cache on OpenAFS itself^^ It still needs a partition, but you can loopmount a file for it. Or use memcache. I still would go with ext2 or ext3. But maybe some other fs is a bit faster, never tested. > Thanks... > > Dirk MfG, Lars Schimmer - -- - ------------------------------------------------------------- TU Graz, Institut für ComputerGraphik & WissensVisualisierung Tel: +43 316 873-5405 E-Mail: l.schim...@cgv.tugraz.at Fax: +43 316 873-5402 PGP-Key-ID: 0x4A9B1723 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEUEARECAAYFAlCaOg8ACgkQmWhuE0qbFyM0DQCYlQMEG65TFKiPzzrdyGUJOQrH vgCfS/Viv/C2OHVakRSHjkH22sybfhc= =4yck -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
