Am Mittwoch 07 November 2012, 09:02:44 schrieb Marc Dionne: > In my (limited) experience with memcache, it doesn't behave very well > if the system is memory contrained and is under pressure.
Hmm, I wouldn't call a system with 4G memory and not much more running than KDE with a handful of apps (mail, web browser) memory constrained ;) > > Thanks a lot. The idea was to setup a btrfs-only VM for testing purposes, > > and use a subvolume for the cache. Not sure about the loop-mount method > > in this case, since you also can't put swapfiles on btrfs. > > I have some machines that have used btrfs as a cache for a long time. > It initially exposed a few bugs in the caching code but I'm not aware > of any issues in the 1.6 releases. OK, great. So it shouldn't be a problem to use a btrfs subvolume and (maybe) set some quota. Bye... Dirk -- Dirk Heinrichs <dirk.heinri...@altum.de> Tel: +49 (0)2471 209385 | Mobil: +49 (0)176 34473913 GPG Public Key C2E467BB | Jabber: dirk.heinri...@altum.de
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.