On Thu, 14 Aug 2014 10:06:31 +0200 Markus Koeberl <markus.koeb...@tugraz.at> wrote:
> On Thursday 14 August 2014 05:26:36 Andrew Deason wrote: > > This generally sounds reasonable to me. But I think you want to just > > require a dot if the name doesn't exist in the csdb at all, so you > > can just put it in the local csdb if you want to use it, without > > needing to alias it to a full cell name. (This may have been > > mentioned earlier, but I don't see it here.) I'd call such an option > > -afsdb-ndots, which would set the minimum number of dots (like > > resolv.conf's "option ndots"). > > This would require changing the format of the CellServDB or did I get > something wrong? You can have a csdb entry that just lists a cell and doesn't list servers for it. Unless there's something else I said that sounded like changing the format...? > > A blacklist might help for a vast majority of cases, though. Or of > > course we could just improve the caching, so only the first lookup is > > slow... would that be good enough, if done "well"? > > A improved caching would be very nice for the bash completion. What I was trying to get at is "which is _more_ useful"? (Improved caching, or a blacklist/whitelist.) Or if the answer is "either one would make me happy", that would be good to know. -- Andrew Deason adea...@sinenomine.net _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info