03.09.2010 00:04, Steven Dake wrote: > On 09/02/2010 01:28 PM, Vadym Chepkov wrote: >> >> On Sep 2, 2010, at 3:09 PM, Steven Dake wrote: >> >>> On 08/31/2010 08:45 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> 31.08.2010 22:22, Steven Dake wrote: >>>>> I am pleased to announce Corosync 1.2.8 is available for immediate >>>>> download from our website. >>>> >>>> Initscript doesn't seem to be fixed yet. >>>> http://marc.info/?l=openais&m=128271460429681&w=2 >>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/pacema...@oss.clusterlabs.org/msg05833.html >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Vladislav >>> >>> Fabio, >>> >>> Any chance you can provide feedback on this topic? I'm at a loss in >>> this area of distro integration. >>> >> >> I have complained about it some time ago, but was dismissed :) > > Vadym, > > My general take is it is the responsibility of individual distros to > tailor the init scripts to their particular startup order. > > But rather then you being dismissed, I'd like to hear Fabio's reasoning > so we can all come to some agreement. Unfortunately I don't know enough > about the particulars of the init script dependencies to make that > judgement. Fabio should be able to provide appropriate reasoning. >
One option to make everybody happy would be the following: Provide two init scripts, say 'corosync-early' and 'corosync-late' (the same is for openais), former has 20 80 - for CMAN/PCMKv1/whatever else, later has 98 02 - for PCMKv0. And control which one should be started by variable in /etc/sysconfig/corosync which should be mandatory and checked very early in that scripts. Redhat already has same suffixes for readehead. Best, Vladislav _______________________________________________ Openais mailing list Openais@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/openais
