On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Geoffrey Hutchison <ge...@geoffhutchison.net> wrote: >> Is there some method to this that I'm missing? Would anyone object to >> the change I propose? > > The main requirement is that you don't remove API. Otherwise, I think we'd > all be happy to see improvements.
Ok -- I will probably remove the DataChanged function, but I just added that to trunk a few weeks ago, so it shouldn't be a major problem, correct? I don't think it made it into any releases. Would changing protected variables be considered breaking API? I want to get rid of the _a etc, _alpha etc, _v1 etc and just replace them all with matrix3x3 _m. By the way -- thanks for closing my bugs earlier, I always forget to do that when I'm done with them :-) Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ OpenBabel-Devel mailing list OpenBabel-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbabel-devel
