> So, mola += molb adds molb to mola but does not copy the stereo or > residue info (among others). Is there a rationale for this?
No. It's just old OpenEye code that clearly hasn't been updated. > Shouldn't mola = molb and mola += molb share an almost identical > implementation (e.g. call a common function), except that a new > Molecule is created in the first case? Sounds like a great idea! (evil grin) -Geoff ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d _______________________________________________ OpenBabel-Devel mailing list OpenBabel-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbabel-devel
