On 2013-06-06 22:13, Geoffrey Hutchison wrote: >> Although I'm starting to think that json is such a simple format >> that it could do without a strict chemical specification. Getting json out of an OBMol is <5 lines of code > > My concern is the opposite. It's always easy to write to an > arbitrary format from an OBMol. Parsing a pile of different formats is a pain, which is why it'd be better to have a somewhat standardized, extensible style. >
I'd argue that chemdoodle json, cml json, whatever json should be added to input/output formats. Openbabel's "own" json format would obviously be OBMols serialized to json. Neither requires making up yet another data model. Dimitri ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments: 1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transition and operations 2. Dashboards that offer high-level views of enterprise services 3. A single system of record for all IT processes http://p.sf.net/sfu/servicenow-d2d-j _______________________________________________ OpenBabel-discuss mailing list OpenBabel-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbabel-discuss
