I concur, and I've voiced concerns about this to a number of companies who have pre-cloud license models. Its going to be an interesting ride ..
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Alan Williamson <[email protected]> wrote: > Matthew Woodward wrote: >> Life in the cloud is a whole lot simpler when you don't have to worry >> about licensing. > > or server infrastructure. The heavy lifting of CFML apps should be > __OUR__ responsibility as engine makers, not for you as CFML developers. > > CFML developers just want to cut code. They don't really want to mess > around with J2EE, servers, web servers, databases and all the > configuration file mess that comes with it. > > OpenBD on GAE is a ___HUGE___ mind shift for CFML developers, and for > those that get the true power early, will discover a huge financial gain > for you and your clients. > > No license costs. > No server costs. > No configuration problems. > Pay-as-you-go model. > Maintained by one of the biggest data companies in the world. > > What's there not to like! > > And Google App Engine is just but one cloud provider ... there others, > that we'll be running towards to support too. > > OpenBD is the only TRUE cloud friendly CFML engine out there. > > -- > aw2.0 > http://www.aw20.co.uk/ > > -- > Open BlueDragon Public Mailing List > http://www.openbluedragon.org/ http://twitter.com/OpenBlueDragon > mailing list - http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en > > !! save a network - please trim replies before posting !! -- Open BlueDragon Public Mailing List http://www.openbluedragon.org/ http://twitter.com/OpenBlueDragon mailing list - http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en !! save a network - please trim replies before posting !!
