Not so much technical thoughts, perhaps just too much tryptophan:
> If that is what people want to do, then who are we to 
> stop them!
>   
Actually, I'm not sure if cfscript was what I WANTED to do. It seems 
more like the community wants me to.
It IS much easier to work with in many cases, but the conversion itself 
seemed more forced, than choice, to me.
> There is more to CFML than just the syntax of the language.   CFML for 
> me is a platform.   It offers far more to me as a web developer than 
> simply tags and functions.
>   
Yes, I totally agree. I hope it continues to prosper, despite the 
pundits of questionable motivation who continue their attempts to "blog 
it away".

I can't help but wonder if we're on a road to an Adobe über engine - 
some amalgam of CF, Java, Flex, ECMA and ActionScript - that will all 
just magically get along, compile, and instantly deploy to app stores 
everywhere.

Al

-- 
Open BlueDragon Public Mailing List
 http://www.openbluedragon.org/   http://twitter.com/OpenBlueDragon
 mailing list - http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en

 !! save a network - please trim replies before posting !!

Reply via email to