No it should be
{
a = "b",
c = "d",
}
-----Original Message-----
From: Alan Williamson [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, 30 November 2009 7:41 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [OpenBD] FW/1 and OpenBD 1.2
no worries Sean, and no "taking it the wrong way" :)
the struct literals will be coming soon, although i did look at some of
your code and was __shocked__ that the struct literals are not actually
compatiable with Javascript! Did i get this wrong?
Is the format right enough:
{
a = "b";
c = "d";
}
Tell me they didn't further bastardise CFSCRIPT and take it further away
from Javascript syntax?
Sean Corfield wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 8:57 AM, Alan Williamson<[email protected]> wrote:
>> It is resolved now though. Pick up tomorrows nightly build
>
> I can confirm that the latest nightly build runs FW/1 from SVN with no
> changes. Some of the examples fail due to lack of support for struct
> literals but all the core and the basic examples work just fine -
> thanx!
--
aw2.0
http://www.aw20.co.uk/
--
Open BlueDragon Public Mailing List
http://www.openbluedragon.org/ http://twitter.com/OpenBlueDragon
mailing list - http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en
!! save a network - please trim replies before posting !!
--
Open BlueDragon Public Mailing List
http://www.openbluedragon.org/ http://twitter.com/OpenBlueDragon
mailing list - http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en
!! save a network - please trim replies before posting !!
