On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Matthew Woodward <[email protected]> wrote: > I'd be very suspicious your editor is somehow corrupting the file in a way > that isn't apparent within the editor itself. I'd try different editors to > verify but that's what it sounds like to me.
Could it just be that editing the file forced a recompile of the CFML and the bytecode generated was different under the new build of OpenBD? Since Jason says he's seen similar behavior with other "identical" code, I wonder if there was some change at the low-level in OpenBD that may cause problems with existing bytecode and forcing a recompile was sufficient to fix it? (I don't know enough about OpenBD's compilation model to be sure but it seems a plausible option to me, based on what Jason reports) -- Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN Railo Technologies US -- http://getrailo.com/ An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood
-- Open BlueDragon Public Mailing List http://www.openbluedragon.org/ http://twitter.com/OpenBlueDragon mailing list - http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en !! save a network - please trim replies before posting !!
