On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 9:10 AM, nitish pandey <[email protected]>wrote:
> 1.What is the advantage of having ability to write the same thing in > CFSCRIPT? Just makes it fancy? > Many would argue yes. :-) It's a stylistic thing, really. There's nothing you *can* do in CFSCRIPT that you *can't* do with tags, though the opposite is indeed still true (though to a much less degree than it used to be). > > 2.That reminds me, this.datasource property in Application.cfc does not > help in Cfquery tag taking that value as the default data source. > That is an interesting feature of ACF. > I don't believe this has been implemented in OpenBD yet, though I suspect it would be pretty easy to do so. Personally I find that feature to be of dubious usefulness since setting your datasource name as an application variable yourself accomplishes precisely the same thing, but if you'd like to see that added please add a ticket here: http://code.google.com/p/openbluedragon/issues/list -- Matthew Woodward [email protected] http://blog.mattwoodward.com identi.ca / Twitter: @mpwoodward Please do not send me proprietary file formats such as Word, PowerPoint, etc. as attachments. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -- official tag/function reference: http://openbd.org/manual/ mailing list - http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en
