nitish pandey wrote:
1.What is the advantage of having ability to write the same thing in
CFSCRIPT? Just makes it fancy?
For OpenBD there is actually a performance gain by using CFSCRIPT blocks
instead of the tags. There is also a slight memory reduction, but this
is not much over and above. You only notice this for big blocks (20
lines+)
It comes down to readability and personal preference.
I personally put all business-logic and faceless code in CFSCRIPT, and
use tags for all rendering. I love the Javascript like syntax and
find it very easy to code things up quickly.
I also use <cfscript language="java"> a lot. I will sometimes drop
into raw Java for anything that would be a little "clunky" in
CFML/CFSCRIPT. molnfront demonstrated an excellent use case for this
earlier this week in his post about XML-RPC.
Its all about choice ... OpenBD gives you as much as possible/practical.
--
official tag/function reference: http://openbd.org/manual/
mailing list - http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en
