Even so, developers consuming other code-bases may be affected even if they find <cfscript> to be an enigma. (not so sure about that ...)
ColdBox too really encourages script-based CFCs (though it does support both techniques), and I think once OpenBD supports it, it'll make lives easier for the various frameworks and open source projects. Billy Cravens On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Alan Williamson (aw2.0 cloud experts) < [email protected]> wrote: > Well yeah that is true ... however the developers i come in contact with > and assist, CFSCRIPT is still a mystery to them. So i don't think its wide > spread. > > I don't think its hurt OpenBD adoption in the slightest because we don't > support it. It is coming, so it will soon become a moot point. > > > Sean Corfield wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 11:16 PM, Alan Williamson (aw2.0 cloud > experts)<[email protected]> <[email protected]> wrote: > > Aah yes, we don't support that yet ... but its being looked into. Not a > hugely used feature, hence the reason we haven't supported it thus. > > That depends on who you ask, I suspect. Folks on ACF9 and Railo 3.2 > are using component { ... } a lot because they can. FW/1 2.0 and DI/1 > both require that so they won't run on OpenBD at the moment. > > -- > official tag/function reference: http://openbd.org/manual/ > mailing list - http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en > -- official tag/function reference: http://openbd.org/manual/ mailing list - http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en
