On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Alan Williamson (aw2.0 cloud experts) <[email protected]> wrote: > slightly off-topic .. but i believe it will rise wonderfully well to it. > After all, isn't NoSQL a beautiful means of storing a POJO?
Indeed. > doing a lot with MongoDB over the last year, and the integration to Java > (and OpenBD) is a complete breeze with absolutely non of the headaches that > traditional java.sql.Connection connectivity brings. I maintain Clojure's JDBC library and I'm a committer on the Clojure MongoDB and the latter is a better fit for the arbitrary nested data structures that are common in Clojure (and closely resemble non-circular graphs of related objects in Java). > I do not believe the NoSQL movement is at a stage yet, where we can think of > a standardized layer (read API) to them. No, right now each data store seems very different. CouchDB and MongoDB are the most closely aligned, as far as I can tell (both are document stores). Given there are broadly four very different types of "noSQL" data store, I wonder how many competitors each of the four sectors will see in reality? -- Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/ Railo Technologies, Inc. -- http://www.getrailo.com/ "Perfection is the enemy of the good." -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880) -- official tag/function reference: http://openbd.org/manual/ mailing list - http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en
