This is best done using j2ee sessions and the alternative managers
available if you hunt google you will see SessionManagers for memcache etc
already implemented i know of one for tomcat for example. Once its in
memcache or a db if you choose easy for you to keep tabs and clear up as
you see fit

A



On 4 January 2012 19:57, Matthew Woodward <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Ivo Verbeek (Ritense) 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> > What DOES happen in that scenario is that after the session expires, any
>> > session data OTHER than the CFID and CFTOKEN does go away. So for
>> example
>> > if a session starts and you do <cfset session.foo = "bar" /> then while
>> the
>> > session is active if you dump the session, you'll see that variable in
>> the
>> > dump. After the session expires the CFID and CFTOKEN will be the same as
>> > they were before, but session.foo will no longer exist. So in short the
>> > session does get expired, it just retains the same CFID and CFTOKEN.
>>
>> Sorry, this is where I do not agree.
>
>
> Then I'm not seeing the same thing you are. I tested that quite a bit and
> worst case after 5 minutes the session data would disappear.
>
> When I wait longer, 5+ minutes, I reload, I then see
>> the onSessionStart being triggered and session.start is fresh. CFID &
>> CFTOKEN are indeed unchanged.
>>
>
> If I'm understanding what you're saying, that's the expected behavior. The
> 5 minute cycle is independent of the session start time, i.e. it's for the
> server as a whole. So you would never necessarily see your session timing
> out after 5 seconds. It would only happen if the timing of the start of
> your session was right before the session expiration job ran.
>
>
>>
>> I still have to think that there is a bug: timed-out sessions who are
>> still in memory and re-used, are not checked to see if they are timed
>> out.
>
>
> But they are checked and do expire, just not with the level of precision I
> think you're expecting.
>
>
>> If they still exist, they are being re-used.
>
>
> Just to clarify, the "they" here is the CFID and CFTOKEN, but other
> session data does get wiped out. And my guess (although I haven't
> confirmed) is that it's just reusing the values from the cookie, it's not
> anything retained in memory.
>
>
>> I depends on the
>> other process to actually clear them from server memory. And that
>> process is the one and only that looks at the time-out value.
>>
>
> That's correct.
>
>
>> But openBD > system info shows "0 active sessions" .... I guess that
>> is not working for J2EE sessions.
>>
>
> Please file that as a ticket for us to look into if you don't mind--I'm
> calling a function in the engine from the admin console that reports active
> sessions so it may be the function needs to take J2EE sessions into
> consideration.
> http://code.google.com/p/openbluedragon/issues/list
>
> That article makes a lot of sense. Thanks for that. But even the
>> author doesn't think they are useless, it is just that the way they
>> are implemented is crap.
>
>
> Ergo they're useless. :-) I'm half-joking but this does tend to be one of
> the few areas where I take a pretty hard line simply because I don't think
> they're a good solution for the problems most people use them to solve.
>
>
>> Well, wouldn't it be a nice one for openBD to
>> do it better then :-) So not client vars as Adobe does them, but
>> really as session-in-database like e.g. give more control when and how
>> they are actually being read and especially write. Which more like
>> sessions, but then sessions-in-database. And only when you actually
>> define them and not always.
>>
>
> I'd be curious to hear more about what you have in mind--it might be
> interesting to, as with client variables, be able to define a storage
> location for session variables for the application so when you access
> session variables the machinery behind the scenes goes to the appropriate
> place (RAM, memcache, database, etc.) to get the data. The tricky part of
> course is dealing with complex objects though those could of course be
> serialized/deserialized as needed (or perhaps something specific and
> appropriate to each datastore type could be implemented). Something worth
> looking into perhaps.
>
> --
> Matthew Woodward
> [email protected]
> http://blog.mattwoodward.com
> identi.ca / Twitter: @mpwoodward
>
> Please do not send me proprietary file formats such as Word, PowerPoint,
> etc. as attachments.
> http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
>
>  --
> online documentation: http://openbd.org/manual/
> google+ hints/tips: https://plus.google.com/115990347459711259462
> http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en
>
> Join us @ http://www.OpenCFsummit.org/ Dallas, Feb 2012
>



-- 
Alex Skinner
Managing Director
Pixl8 Interactive

Tel: +448452600726
Email: [email protected]
Web: pixl8.co.uk

-- 
online documentation: http://openbd.org/manual/
   google+ hints/tips: https://plus.google.com/115990347459711259462
     http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en

     Join us @ http://www.OpenCFsummit.org/ Dallas, Feb 2012

Reply via email to