Strange.. So this is definitely a memory issue? On Apr 29, 7:10 pm, Alan Williamson <[email protected]> wrote: > QoQ is _NOT_ heavy on memory .. so i would be looking elsewhere in your > app for this memory usage > > On 29/04/2012 18:20, Trenatos wrote: > > > > > > > > > If you're talking about the whole tomcat setup, I think I have it set > > to max at around 400. (Catalina options) > > I have no big tables, one database has a few hundred entries, but > > nothing too bad. Granted I should optimize how that site sorts things, > > it would take down traffic some. Is QoQ that heavy on memory? Or is it > > a MySQL setting I should look at? > > > On Apr 29, 5:07 pm, Alan Williamson<[email protected]> wrote: > >> Chances are you running in the default setup of 64MB. This is pretty > >> much useless these days in any sort of server environment. > > >> I recommend giving yourself at least 512MB and then going again. We > >> use QoQ all the time and it is a very powerful feature and we've never > >> had any memory problems.
-- online documentation: http://openbd.org/manual/ google+ hints/tips: https://plus.google.com/115990347459711259462 http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en
