On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 06:05, Michael Bell wrote:
> >>Also I include patches to OpenSSL.pm and X509.pm, many of the changes are
> >>to stop the complaints when running with -w, but in OpenSSL I stripped off
> The patches are ok. I start the integration together with SMIME integration.
great!
> I finished a first version OpenCA::OpenSSL::Fast and start including it
> into OpenCA::OpenSSL. This will speedup the parsing. So perhaps you have
> not to serialize X509 objects.
I will try it, it sure will be a boost of performance.
> > - I think private keys should be handled in a way similar to X509,
> > there is something already done in the proyect?
> No.
What do you think about it? You consider it good/necessary/unuseful?
> There is one additional TODO. Can you add the flag "-engine
> $params{ENGINE}"?
Yes, sure.. I forgot about it! :-)
Martin.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
OpenCA-Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openca-devel
