At 10:06 PM +0100 on 12/1/99, M. Uli Kusterer wrote: > put 5 into variable varName This sounds like a verbose way of writing "put 5 into varName" not "put 5 into the variable which has the name contained in the variable varName" (And no, I'm NOT proposing the latter as syntax!) But, btw: Any syntax like this is horrible. Variables will be assigned numbers at tokenize or compile time. Something like this will force NullCPU to be able to handle dynamically numberd, allocated, and deallocated variables, without causing variable conflicts... These will become HORRENDUS statements, and I'm in favor of banning this with an error message along the lines of "You dog can script with better style.", or just a long stream of profanity.
- OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk syntax - hierarchy Alain Farmer
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk syntax - hierarchy DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk syntax - hierarchy M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk syntax - hierarchy M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk syntax - hierarchy DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk syntax - hiera... M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk syntax - h... DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk synta... Rob Cozens
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk s... Rob Cozens
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTa... DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk s... DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTa... M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk synta... M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk syntax - hierarchy Michael Fair
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk syntax - hierarchy M. Uli Kusterer
