>These will become HORRENDUS statements, and I'm in favor of banning this
>with an error message along the lines of "You dog can script with better
>style.", or just a long stream of profanity.
Anthony,
yeah, it will require some coding. Although it *should* be possible. but
there are better solutions than generating such variables. Usually people
use this to emulate arrays, so we'd best just give them something like
that. I'm in favor of associative arrays like MC has (with a hash lookup,
of course), but with a syntax that looks more like properties.
Cheers,
-- M. Uli Kusterer
------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.weblayout.com/witness
'The Witnesses of TeachText are everywhere...'
--- HELP SAVE HYPERCARD: ---
Details at: http://www.hyperactivesw.com/SaveHC.html
Sign: http://www.giguere.uqam.ca/petition/hcpetition.html
- OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk syntax - hierarchy Alain Farmer
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk syntax - hierarchy DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk syntax - hierarchy M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk syntax - hierarchy M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk syntax - hierarchy DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk syntax - hiera... M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk syntax - h... DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk synta... Rob Cozens
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk s... Rob Cozens
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTa... DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk s... DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTa... M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk synta... M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk syntax - hierarchy Michael Fair
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk syntax - hierarchy M. Uli Kusterer
