I tried it out, compiled and all tests succeeded (bar the AtomTable one which has been broken for a while now). Haven't looked in depth at the code though...
Oh, another read me change...if the scheme shell runs on a separate port then the README should reflect that. David, do you agree that the dynmod is ready to be pushed as unstable? J On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Gustavo Machado Campagnani Gama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm waiting for dhart to give me the "go ahead" -- and I think he's > waiting for a bit more testing. So far, it seems that he was the only > one who has tried it. > > -- > Gustavo > > On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 17:43 -0700, Joel Pitt wrote: >> Hi Gama, >> >> Just wondering if you plan to make the dynmod branch the unstable one >> soon. Just notice that you've had to do a lot of rebasing to it, and >> after committing my attention branch, I suspect you'll have to do >> more... Once there is a unstable branch we can switch to using that >> for a lot of development. >> >> Cheers >> J > > _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~opencog-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~opencog-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
