Dynmod looks ready to me to become the new official unstable branch! After the push, current work-in-progress should rebase to unstable (as soon as is practical), and new work should be branched from unstable.
Under a 2-branch scheme, the trunk will be periodically rebased to unstable and go through stabilization periods in anticipation of official versioned releases. -dave On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Joel Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I tried it out, compiled and all tests succeeded (bar the AtomTable > one which has been broken for a while now). Haven't looked in depth at > the code though... > > Oh, another read me change...if the scheme shell runs on a separate > port then the README should reflect that. > > David, do you agree that the dynmod is ready to be pushed as unstable? > > J > > On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Gustavo Machado Campagnani Gama > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm waiting for dhart to give me the "go ahead" -- and I think he's > > waiting for a bit more testing. So far, it seems that he was the only > > one who has tried it. > > > > -- > > Gustavo > > > > On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 17:43 -0700, Joel Pitt wrote: > >> Hi Gama, > >> > >> Just wondering if you plan to make the dynmod branch the unstable one > >> soon. Just notice that you've had to do a lot of rebasing to it, and > >> after committing my attention branch, I suspect you'll have to do > >> more... Once there is a unstable branch we can switch to using that > >> for a lot of development. > >> > >> Cheers > >> J > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~opencog-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~opencog-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
