I think it could help a lot in solving one problem you currently have:
Mapping multiple roughly-synonymous ways of saying the same thing,
into the same logical relationship-set (you've referred to this as
phrase-level "synonymy" before).   The way it helps is by constituting
a viable "logical normal form" for everyday commonsense statements...

I think it can also help, down the road, in terms of enabling
automatic (no hand coded rules) building of mapping rules between
syntactico-semantic rules learned by unssupervised learning, and
logical relationships that are tractable for PLN to reason on...

-- Ben






On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 8:03 AM, Linas Vepstas <linasveps...@gmail.com> wrote:
> FWIW, I am virulently anti-lojban, because mostly I believe it doesn't solve
> any problems that we actually have. --linas
>
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Jim Rutt <jimr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I like this idea very much.  I'm currently considering Lojban as a
>> "knowledge engineering" language for a "really smart AI for games" project
>> I'm starting to spin up.  Prior to full on AGI I see some fruitful problems
>> to be solved using "sort of AGIish" software that depends on human created
>> domain specific declarative knowledge.  My hypothesis is that there is a
>> useful and talented - and not too expensive - class of human talent that can
>> learn Lojban well who would not be appropriate for using tools that are less
>> human language-like.  These might include very bright but highly
>> anti-quantitative liberal arts grads.  Lojban strikes me as a potentially
>> quite good adapter between the world of humans and the world of machines.
>>
>> ko pilno lo clearer pensi la lojban
>>
>> jim
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 7:44 AM, Ben Goertzel <b...@goertzel.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Here is a modest proposal, which would replace Relex2Logic with
>>> something vaguely similar in spirit but much superior,
>>>
>>> http://wiki.opencog.org/wikihome/index.php/Lojbanic_Relex2Logic
>>>
>>> Actually it's a bit closer to the spirit of the bad old RelEx2Frame,
>>> but with the significant difference that Lojban is a language with
>>> complete coverage of everyday semantics, whereas FrameNet is sorely
>>> limited and hasn't been honed by usage...
>>>
>>> -- Ben
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ben Goertzel, PhD
>>> http://goertzel.org
>>>
>>> Super-benevolent super-intelligence is the thought the Global Brain is
>>> currently struggling to form...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> ===========================
>> Jim Rutt
>> JPR Ventures
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "opencog" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to opencog+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To post to this group, send email to opencog@googlegroups.com.
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/CAPzPGw7p7MKC2d0MucQf8s4AimtSu-rNtkmm8Pprf03iJhJVdA%40mail.gmail.com.
>>
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>



-- 
Ben Goertzel, PhD
http://goertzel.org

Super-benevolent super-intelligence is the thought the Global Brain is
currently struggling to form...

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"opencog" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to opencog+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to opencog@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/CACYTDBf5ytVRB0rLO6VPL95duz89KtWLKcESiNhwencJY5DKdQ%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to