Yeah, we just discussed this F2F. It seems that "OpenPsi" as currently used sorta wraps up two things...
1) The action selector and related tools, which are generic and would be used for a theorem-prover or various other sorts of AIs that have no close resemblance to the human mind 2) A model of human-like psychology / emotion / action-regulation, which at this point is a custom blend of Psi and the CPM (Component Process Model), and may get even more human-specific aspects due to the Hanson Robotics collaboration ... .. and I agree w/ LInas it would be useful to separate these cleanly. Both are valuable but they are distinct. An accurate but long/boring name for 1) would be "Action Selector and Formulator" ... which can fairly enough be abbreviated "action selector" I guess ... A worry with "Decider" is that PLN also decides things, but in the declarative rather than imperative sense.... but... hmmm... An accurate but long/boring name for 2) would be "Human-Like Regulation" I guess ... Name brainstorms will be appreciated ;) ben On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Linas Vepstas <linasveps...@gmail.com> wrote: > The openpsi name is problematic: > > -- Joscha Bach's psi is also open-source > -- openpsi is no longer the main psychological modeller for opencog > (the "component process model" now is) > > This suggests that a better name is needed. > > The functions implemented in openpsi perform a very important task of > selecting and choosing and deciding what to do, based on the need to fulfill > certain goals. The goals need not be psychological goals, and the chosen > "things" are usually "actions" but not necessarily so. > > "action selector" is one but its boring. "action formulator and selector" > ASAF ASF AFS AFAS is aonther mouthful. > > How about "the decider"? > pluses: its short, its a term not used anywhere else in the system, so no > confusion about which subsystem it refers to. Its unique enough that there > is not even a collision with most OS or compsci theory and no confusion with > NN or ANN theory. Yet you can guess what it does, given just its one-word > name. > > minuses: unfortunate reference to dubya. > > --linas > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "opencog" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to opencog+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to opencog@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/CAHrUA35yrok%2BmW-VyPpOOw%3DRT1haUN4wTJr6tSqJungQ6K4WgQ%40mail.gmail.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Ben Goertzel, PhD http://goertzel.org Super-benevolent super-intelligence is the thought the Global Brain is currently struggling to form... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "opencog" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to opencog+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to opencog@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/CACYTDBd_V_vXoPcNjFKMb%2BKu1jaVMfu3tNahPBTMusYG9YDR7w%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
