On 10/17/2016 10:17 AM, Ben Goertzel wrote:
As for the name
ImplicationScopeLink
at first I thought I would prefer
ScopingImplicationLink
but now I'm not sure ;p
Anyway, ugly as it is, I think it may be better to use two different
link types for the different variants, under the general principle we've been
leaning towards lately, that more explicit articulation of logical structures
in Atomspace reduces confusion, and is thus worthwhile even when it
makes things a bit less elegant...
OK. It also tends to simplify the code.
I'll wait for Linas' input (and name suggestion if he has one) and
operate the splitting.
Nil
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"opencog" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to opencog+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to opencog@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/58048051.9050606%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
