Hi Grahame, In my efforts to drum up broader demographic archetype review input, I neglected to thank those, yourself included, who have already made very valuable suggested changes and corrections. Your particular expertise in this field is very much appreciated. I will liaise with Sergio re the current status of responses to your comments - you should definitely have received feedback when the review round was completed.
The current reviews are those to which you have already contributed. My main concern was to try and get a broader 'sign-off' (or otherwise) that these are now fit-for-purpose for a range of developers and other interested parties. Regards, Ian Dr Ian McNicoll office / fax +44(0)141 560 4657 mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859 skype ianmcnicoll ian.mcnicoll at oceaninformatics.com ian at mcmi.co.uk Clinical Analyst Ocean Informatics openEHR Archetype Editorial Group Member BCS Primary Health Care SG Group www.phcsg.org / BCS Health Scotland On 8 June 2010 02:00, Grahame Grieve <grahame at kestral.com.au> wrote: > Hi Ian > > The archetypes had been open to comment once before, and I commented at > length > at that time. (or are these different archetypes?) > > Maybe it's just because I can't use CKM well, but I cannot find any > responses > to my comments. Looking at the archetypes, I can't tell whether my comments > have caused any change (A quick survey suggests not) > > Most of my comments reflected requirements brought forward by a number > of national programs through the ISO 21090 process, so I think they'll > eventually come up. > > Grahame > > > On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Ian McNicoll > <Ian.McNicoll at oceaninformatics.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We have had a couple of Demographics model archetypes up for review on > CKM > > for some time but with very little input from the community at large. > This > > may reflect low demand for these archetypes, but there seemed to be quite > a > > lot of interest prior to the reviews being opened. I appreciate everyone > is > > pushed for time and it may be that the lack of comment reflects the > overall > > high quality of the archetypes that Sergio and his colleagues have > > developed. Certainly we have been making use of them in a number of > > different local and national projects with a high degree of success, so > > perhaps the lack of feedback simply reflects that they are not causing > upset > > or controversy. However, it would be really helpful if anyone who is > using > > or who expects to use these archetypes could have a look and, if nothing > > else, just sign them off as being acceptable. > > > > The ethos of openEHR is about developing shared content models, we can > only > > do that if we get input from those with an interest in these models - the > > more early input we get, the better and more stable will be the resulting > > archetypes. > > > > We plan to keep the review rounds open for another 2 weeks and then close > > them off with a view to publication. > > > > Any contributions would be very much appreciated. > > > > The links are > > > > Address : > http://www.openehr.org/knowledge/OKM.html#showArchetype_1013.1.484 > > > > Person Name: > > http://www.openehr.org/knowledge/OKM.html#showArchetype_1013.1.477 > > > > Regards, > > > > Ian > > > > Dr Ian McNicoll > > office / fax +44(0)141 560 4657 > > mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859 > > skype ianmcnicoll > > ian.mcnicoll at oceaninformatics.com > > ian at mcmi.co.uk > > > > Clinical Analyst Ocean Informatics openEHR Archetype Editorial Group > > Member BCS Primary Health Care SG Group www.phcsg.org / BCS Health > Scotland > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > openEHR-clinical mailing list > > openEHR-clinical at openehr.org > > http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical > > > > > > -- > Grahame Grieve, CTO > A: Suite 8a / 17 Burgundy St, Heidelberg VIC 3083 > P: + 61 3 9450 2230 > M: + 61 411 460 568 > F: + 61 3 92450 2299 > E: grahame at kestral.com.au > W: http://www.kestral.com.au > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-clinical mailing list > openEHR-clinical at openehr.org > http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20100608/8a21f0ce/attachment.html>
