On 08/06/2010 09:49, Ian McNicoll wrote: > Hi Grahame, > > In my efforts to drum up broader demographic archetype review input, I > neglected to thank those, yourself included, who have already made > very valuable suggested changes and corrections. Your particular > expertise in this field is very much appreciated. I will liaise with > Sergio re the current status of responses to your comments - you > should definitely have received feedback when the review round was > completed. > > The current reviews are those to which you have already contributed. > My main concern was to try and get a broader 'sign-off' (or otherwise) > that these are now fit-for-purpose for a range of developers and other > interested parties. > > Regards, > > Ian
My feeling is that better review of these archetypes will come when they are used more in real environments, rather than on a purely theoretical basis. This is happening now, but of course it will take some time. - thomas beale * * -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20100608/8dd17177/attachment.html>
