Let's publish this
Sam

Sent from my phone

On 23/08/2011, at 6:18 PM, Ian McNicoll <Ian.McNicoll at oceaninformatics.com> 
wrote:

> Hi Wajahat,
> 
> I think this is a more accurate mapping:
> 
> 1. Author equals COMPOSITION/composer
> 
> 2. CDA Code equals "Document Type" - no direct RM attribute
> It could be
>  a) Hard-wired into transforms from openEHR documents
>   b) Represented as a an archetyped node in a COMPOSITION Report archetype
>   c) Carried as a term Mapping on the Document Name i.e
> Composition/name/mappings/code_mapping ..
> 
> 3. CDA ID equals COMPOSITION/UID .
> 
> 4. CDA Title equals COMPOSITION/name (as DV_CODED_TEXT)
> 
> 5. Custodian equals
>   Participation or
>   COMPOSITION/context/health_care_facility or COMPOSITION/composer
> 
> 6. Data Enterer equals CONTRIBUTION/version/audit/commiter
> 
> 7. Patient Role equals Role
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Ian
> Dr Ian McNicoll
> office +44 (0)1536 414 994
> fax +44 (0)1536 516317
> mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859
> skype ianmcnicoll
> ian.mcnicoll at oceaninformatics.com
> 
> Clinical Modelling Consultant, Ocean Informatics, UK
> openEHR Clinical Knowledge Editor www.openehr.org/knowledge
> Honorary Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL
> BCS Primary Health Care  www.phcsg.org
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 23 August 2011 08:19, Wajahat Ali Khan <wajahatali1985 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I am working on running an end to end scenario between HL7 CDA and openEHR.
>> For the very said reason I have performed ontology mappings of the two
>> standards ontologies for the mapping file to be generated. Other than the
>> mapping file, I found few concepts of HL7 CDA schema to be mapped with
>> openEHR concepts. The list of the mappings are (Left hand side are HL7 CDA
>> concepts while right hand side concepts are of open EHR)
>> 1. Author equals Related Party
>> 2. CDA Code equals Archetype Details
>> 3. CDA ID equals UID
>> 4. CDA Title equals Name
>> 5. Custodian equals Participation
>> 6. Data Enterer equals Party Reference
>> 7. Patient Role equals Role
>> I need validity of the mappings, if anyone can evaluate the mappings and if
>> wrong kindly guide me by providing me correct counterpart entities. I would
>> also like guidance from an expert for validity of future mappings as well. I
>> will be grateful for support in this regard.
>> Best Regards,
>> Wajahat Ali
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> openEHR-clinical mailing list
>> openEHR-clinical at openehr.org
>> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-clinical mailing list
> openEHR-clinical at openehr.org
> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical


Reply via email to