Hi, For 2., if a template represents a document, then archetypeDetails.templateId can be considered as the "document code".
Cheers, Pablo. -- Kind regards, Ing. Pablo Pazos Guti?rrez LinkedIn: http://uy.linkedin.com/in/pablopazosgutierrez Blog: http://informatica-medica.blogspot.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/ppazos > From: Ian.McNicoll at oceaninformatics.com > Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 09:18:13 +0100 > Subject: Re: Mappings between openEHR and HL7 CDA > To: openehr-clinical at openehr.org > > Hi Wajahat, > > I think this is a more accurate mapping: > > 1. Author equals COMPOSITION/composer > > 2. CDA Code equals "Document Type" - no direct RM attribute > It could be > a) Hard-wired into transforms from openEHR documents > b) Represented as a an archetyped node in a COMPOSITION Report archetype > c) Carried as a term Mapping on the Document Name i.e > Composition/name/mappings/code_mapping .. > > 3. CDA ID equals COMPOSITION/UID . > > 4. CDA Title equals COMPOSITION/name (as DV_CODED_TEXT) > > 5. Custodian equals > Participation or > COMPOSITION/context/health_care_facility or COMPOSITION/composer > > 6. Data Enterer equals CONTRIBUTION/version/audit/commiter > > 7. Patient Role equals Role > > Regards, > > Ian > Dr Ian McNicoll > office +44 (0)1536 414 994 > fax +44 (0)1536 516317 > mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859 > skype ianmcnicoll > ian.mcnicoll at oceaninformatics.com > > Clinical Modelling Consultant, Ocean Informatics, UK > openEHR Clinical Knowledge Editor www.openehr.org/knowledge > Honorary Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL > BCS Primary Health Care www.phcsg.org > > > > > On 23 August 2011 08:19, Wajahat Ali Khan <wajahatali1985 at gmail.com> wrote: > > I am working on running an end to end scenario between HL7 CDA and openEHR. > > For the very said reason I have performed ontology mappings of the two > > standards ontologies for the mapping file to be generated. Other than the > > mapping file, I found few concepts of HL7 CDA schema to be mapped with > > openEHR concepts. The list of the mappings are (Left hand side are HL7 CDA > > concepts while right hand side concepts are of open EHR) > > 1. Author equals Related Party > > 2. CDA Code equals Archetype Details > > 3. CDA ID equals UID > > 4. CDA Title equals Name > > 5. Custodian equals Participation > > 6. Data Enterer equals Party Reference > > 7. Patient Role equals Role > > I need validity of the mappings, if anyone can evaluate the mappings and if > > wrong kindly guide me by providing me correct counterpart entities. I would > > also like guidance from an expert for validity of future mappings as well. I > > will be grateful for support in this regard. > > Best Regards, > > Wajahat Ali > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > openEHR-clinical mailing list > > openEHR-clinical at openehr.org > > http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical > > > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-clinical mailing list > openEHR-clinical at openehr.org > http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20110823/7da6b1bf/attachment.html>
