Thank you all for your suggestions, it is very helpful.

At this moment, the level of surveillance will not be very detailed.

The project is to encourage people with certain serious diseases to do 
exercises.
It seems that treatment works better if they do, and the chance for 
surviving a serious disease is also higher.
They will be monitored by there smart-phone.

It is just that they do exercises, that is all, it is not very important 
what they do, that also depends on the person.

But, in other projects, it may well be possible that a more detailed 
surveillance is required, for example for monitoring people which had a 
heart-failure.

I have already written some archetypes before, and now I have 
inspiration to find my way to write these too.

I thank you all

kind regards
Bert Verhees




On 21-12-11 16:40, Ian McNicoll wrote:
> Hi Domingo,
>
> Your suggestions are very appropriate if a very detailed level of
> exercise surveillance is expected but I am not certain from Bert's
> description if this is actually needed.
>
> I have an example of a pulmonary function test archetype which
> includes V02max. It might be interesting for you to have a look at it
> and see if we can it fit enough for review on CKM.
>
> Ian
>
> Dr Ian McNicoll
> office +44 (0)1536 414 994
> fax +44 (0)1536 516317
> mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859
> skype ianmcnicoll
> ian.mcnicoll at oceaninformatics.com
>
> Clinical Modelling Consultant, Ocean Informatics, UK
> Director/Clinical Knowledge Editor openEHR Foundation  
> www.openehr.org/knowledge
> Honorary Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL
> SCIMP Working Group, NHS Scotland
> BCS Primary Health Care  www.phcsg.org
>
>
>
> On 21 December 2011 14:50, Dr. Domingo Liotta (h)
> <domingo_liotta at hotmail.com>  wrote:
>> Hello Bert:
>>
>> A quick database search revealed that the Arquetype: Level of exertion to be
>> useful as you will need to register the patients ?level of fitness? pre and
>> post training.
>> Also you have the related clinical observations: blood pressure, heart rate,
>> ECG recording
>> It would be useful to create a Borg perception of exercise (subjective) as
>> it correlates well with level of exertion.
>> I can be bold and try to make an Arquetype for: VO2max Testing which is my
>> expertise.
>> I didn?t find any ?exercise prescription? Arquetype. ( I?d like to see that
>> too).
>> I?ll help patch the pieces together if you want.
>> Be well
>> Domingo Liotta
>> -----Mensaje original-----
>> From: Bert Verhees
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 8:39 AM
>> To: openehr-clinical at openehr.org
>> Subject: evaluate sport activity
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Can someone give me a hint about how I should do following, which kind
>> of entries are most suitable for this?
>>
>> There is a software-requirement, I work with, which says that a patient
>> should do sport, exercises.
>> And to encourage the patient, there must be some kind of decision
>> support, which checks, the exercises the patient has done, and this
>> evalution must be stored for a later look-back how the patient is doing.
>>
>> So, there must be an archetype which is able to decribe the exercise to
>> do, and there must be an archetype for evaluation-results.
>>
>> I only need some hints to look at, so I am not foolish misusing some
>> concepts.
>>
>> I looked at the entry-classes, evaluation, activity, instruction, and so
>> on. But I am not sure which one to use, because in the documentation,
>> the seem to target other purposes.
>>
>> Can someone give me a hint?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Bert Verhees
>> _______________________________________________
>> openEHR-clinical mailing list
>> openEHR-clinical at openehr.org
>> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> openEHR-clinical mailing list
>> openEHR-clinical at openehr.org
>> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-clinical mailing list
> openEHR-clinical at openehr.org
> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical
>
>


Reply via email to