Er... yes! We were not watching the cc:s properly. Apologies to all. - thomas
On 10/09/2011 20:04, Sam Heard wrote: > Should be on technical list only, > Sam > > Sent from my phone > > On 09/09/2011, at 10:44 PM, Thomas Beale<thomas.beale at > oceaninformatics.com> wrote: > >> On 09/09/2011 10:39, Seref Arikan wrote: >>> Hi Peter, >>> We may be able to replace Eiffel Vision with something else, but that >>> is the next step of experiments, and will take a long discussion >>> before we get started with it. Thanks for the explanation! >> we can certainly do that - EiffelVision is only implicated in GUI builds >> of the AWB. But the AWB can be built (as you know ;-) in any back-form, >> e.g. DLL, .so, or a running service. The entire underlying design is >> predicated on this idea, so doing that is easy. >>
