I think that many scenarios are possible.

 

Complications can occur at the time of procedure, can become apparent at a 
distant time and place, or occur at same place and within the same system at a 
later time.

 

In a complete EHR system there are a number of options. But it is the exchange 
scenario that is trickier.

 

I think there is probably some advantage in recording something explicit about 
Complication within the Procedure archetype that will point to the 
Problem/Diagnosis for details. And similarly if the Problem/Diagnosis is 
entered first, subsequently pointing to a Procedure ACTION as causal will be 
valuable. The link both ways are useful. But if procedure does not have any 
notion of complication within it and is separated from the rest of the EHR in a 
report or message or research aggregation, there is no indication to anyone 
receiving the data that something untoward may have happened.

 

Heather

 

From: openEHR-clinical [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Sam Heard
Sent: Wednesday, 17 April 2013 8:59 PM
To: For openEHR clinical discussions
Subject: RE: Complications in an event

 

Ian replied much inline with my views. If it is a serious complication, such as 
pneumonia, it will have its own diagnosis as well, which may even contain a 
following aetiology statement to point back.

I would not directly embed the notion of a diagnosis in a procedure.

Cheers Sam

Dr Sam Heard
FRACGP, MRCGP, DRCOG, FACHI
Chairman, Ocean Informatics
Chairman, openEHR Foundation
Chairman, NTGPE
+61417838808

  _____  

From: Grahame Grieve <mailto:[email protected]> 
Sent: ?16/?04/?2013 9:19 PM
To: For openEHR clinical discussions <mailto:openehr-clinical at 
lists.openehr.org> 
Subject: Re: Complications in an event

Hi Sam 

 

Procedure does have complications, but it's a simple text / codeableText. 

We'd rather use Problem/Diagnosis. So the real question is, does the definition 

of Problem/Diagnosis exclude it's use for for complications of a specific event.

 

Grahame

 

 

On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Sam Heard <sam.heard at oceaninformatics.com 
<mailto:sam.heard at oceaninformatics.com> > wrote:

Hi All

It would be good to include Heather here who has been working on operation
notes. I would have thought that complications within the procedure would
potentially be useful.

Cheers, Sam

-----Original Message-----
From: openEHR-clinical [mailto:openehr-clinical-bounces at lists.openehr.org 
<mailto:[email protected]> ]
On Behalf Of Karsten Hilbert
Sent: Tuesday, 16 April 2013 4:33 PM
To: openehr-clinical at lists.openehr.org <mailto:openehr-clinical at 
lists.openehr.org> 
Subject: Re: Complications in an event


On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 12:30:17PM +1000, Grahame Grieve wrote:

> If you are recording an event - perhaps a procedure - and you have
> complications to record, are these problem/diagnoses?

That depends on clinical judgment in each case.

Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ gpg-keyserver.de <http://gpg-keyserver.de> 
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD  4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346

_______________________________________________
openEHR-clinical mailing list
openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org <mailto:openEHR-clinical at 
lists.openehr.org> 
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org


_______________________________________________
openEHR-clinical mailing list
openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org <mailto:openEHR-clinical at 
lists.openehr.org> 
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org





 

-- 
-----
http://www.healthintersections.com.au / grahame at healthintersections.com.au 
<mailto:grahame at healthintersections.com.au>  / +61 411 867 065 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20130419/3271dcb6/attachment.html>

Reply via email to