Complications can be anything from a minor bruise to catastrophic effects
and death.

 

Minor things like a bruise won't need to be recorded anywhere else in the
record.

Complications that are ongoing and are creating issues that warrant being
included in the Problem List should be recorded explicitly in a
Problem/Diagnosis archetype.

Some may be considered an adverse reaction eg to administration of a
substance and need to be recorded using the Adverse Reaction archetype

There may be some that are also considered to be an adverse event and need
to be recorded explicitly in an archetype for that purpose ie as a result of
errors in clinical practice etc.

 

I don't see that a complication is a candidate for an archetype in its own
right, in the same way of any of these mentioned above.

 

Cheers

 

Heather

 

From: openEHR-clinical [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Grahame Grieve
Sent: Friday, 19 April 2013 3:33 PM
To: For openEHR clinical discussions
Subject: Re: Complications in an event

 

hi

 

The principle concern I had was definitional - did the definition of problem
preclude it's use for complications of an event. There's a notion of
ongoing-ness hinted at in the definition, but nothing explicit. And there's
the question about whether (or which) complications of an event have ongoing
implications or not.

 

Clearly there's no definitional issue, and so I'm fine with that. Regarding
the other discussion - since complications can indeed be real ongoing
concerns, I think it would be good for complications to be actually
problems, and explicitly, not using a reference model link. Though there
might still be a use for pure complications, which might be more procedural
in nature?

 

Grahame

 

 

On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Heather Leslie
<heather.leslie at oceaninformatics.com
<mailto:heather.leslie at oceaninformatics.com> > wrote:

I think that many scenarios are possible.

 

Complications can occur at the time of procedure, can become apparent at a
distant time and place, or occur at same place and within the same system at
a later time.

 

In a complete EHR system there are a number of options. But it is the
exchange scenario that is trickier.

 

I think there is probably some advantage in recording something explicit
about Complication within the Procedure archetype that will point to the
Problem/Diagnosis for details. And similarly if the Problem/Diagnosis is
entered first, subsequently pointing to a Procedure ACTION as causal will be
valuable. The link both ways are useful. But if procedure does not have any
notion of complication within it and is separated from the rest of the EHR
in a report or message or research aggregation, there is no indication to
anyone receiving the data that something untoward may have happened.

 

Heather

 

From: openEHR-clinical [mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:openehr-clinical-bounces at lists.openehr.org> ] On Behalf Of Sam Heard
Sent: Wednesday, 17 April 2013 8:59 PM
To: For openEHR clinical discussions
Subject: RE: Complications in an event

 

Ian replied much inline with my views. If it is a serious complication, such
as pneumonia, it will have its own diagnosis as well, which may even contain
a following aetiology statement to point back.

I would not directly embed the notion of a diagnosis in a procedure.

Cheers Sam

Dr Sam Heard
FRACGP, MRCGP, DRCOG, FACHI
Chairman, Ocean Informatics
Chairman, openEHR Foundation
Chairman, NTGPE
+61417838808 <tel:%2B61417838808> 

  _____  

From: Grahame Grieve <mailto:[email protected]> 
Sent: 16/04/2013 9:19 PM
To: For openEHR clinical discussions
<mailto:openehr-clinical at lists.openehr.org> 
Subject: Re: Complications in an event

Hi Sam 

 

Procedure does have complications, but it's a simple text / codeableText. 

We'd rather use Problem/Diagnosis. So the real question is, does the
definition 

of Problem/Diagnosis exclude it's use for for complications of a specific
event.

 

Grahame

 

 

On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Sam Heard <sam.heard at oceaninformatics.com
<mailto:sam.heard at oceaninformatics.com> > wrote:

Hi All

It would be good to include Heather here who has been working on operation
notes. I would have thought that complications within the procedure would
potentially be useful.

Cheers, Sam

-----Original Message-----
From: openEHR-clinical [mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:openehr-clinical-bounces at lists.openehr.org> ]
On Behalf Of Karsten Hilbert
Sent: Tuesday, 16 April 2013 4:33 PM
To: openehr-clinical at lists.openehr.org
<mailto:openehr-clinical at lists.openehr.org> 
Subject: Re: Complications in an event


On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 12:30:17PM +1000, Grahame Grieve wrote:

> If you are recording an event - perhaps a procedure - and you have
> complications to record, are these problem/diagnoses?

That depends on clinical judgment in each case.

Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ gpg-keyserver.de <http://gpg-keyserver.de> 
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD  4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346

_______________________________________________
openEHR-clinical mailing list
openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org
<mailto:openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org> 
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org


_______________________________________________
openEHR-clinical mailing list
openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org
<mailto:openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org> 
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org





 

-- 
-----
http://www.healthintersections.com.au / grahame at healthintersections.com.au
<mailto:grahame at healthintersections.com.au>  / +61 411 867 065
<tel:%2B61%20411%20867%20065>  


_______________________________________________
openEHR-clinical mailing list
openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org
<mailto:openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org> 
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org





 

-- 
-----
http://www.healthintersections.com.au / grahame at healthintersections.com.au
<mailto:grahame at healthintersections.com.au>  / +61 411 867 065 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20130419/f56d1e34/attachment.html>

Reply via email to