The FOLDER approach suggested by Sam looks interesting and flexible for some problem-oriented applications. Especially since folders can be hierarchical (problem vs sub-problem?) and are versioned (and thus easily can be updated without losing log/history info).
What are the experiences positive/negative from using this approach for problem orientation? Any documented? Best regards, Erik Sundvall Ph.D. Medical Informatics. Information Architect. Tel: +46-72-524 54 55 (or 010-1036252 in Sweden) Li?: erik.sundvall at regionostergotland.se (lio.se changing name 1 Jan 2015) LiU: erik.sundvall at liu.se http://www.imt.liu.se/~erisu/ On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 9:33 PM, <sam.heard at openehrfoundation.org> wrote: > It is really problematic in most systems. First there are often more > than one problem addressed. Second, a lot of them are trivial and one off > and do not need to be on the problem list (more reason for encounter). > > I like the idea of doing this with folders in openEHR. No need to link > from the document so it can be done retrospectively. It can even be > different for different users potentially. > > Cheers Sam > > Dr Sam Heard > Chairman, openEHR Foundation > > *From:* pablo pazos <pazospablo at hotmail.com> > *Sent:* ?Tuesday?, ?18? ?November? ?2014 ?1?:?04? ?PM > *To:* For openEHR technical discussions > <openehr-technical at lists.openehr.org>, For openEHR clinical discussions > <openehr-clinical at lists.openehr.org> > > Hi all, just re-sending this question on the clinical list too. > > I'm wondering how to handle the link between documents and health problems > in a problem-oriented record. > > Thanks! > > -- > Kind regards, > Eng. Pablo Pazos Guti?rrez > http://cabolabs.com <http://cabolabs.com/es/home> > <http://twitter.com/ppazos> > > ------------------------------ > From: pazospablo at hotmail.com > To: openehr-technical at lists.openehr.org > Subject: Problem-oriented records and querying by problem > Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 13:28:40 -0300 > > Hi, another question related to querying: > > I have a case of problem-oriented records, where I need to query all the > COMPOSITIONS related to a specific problem (evolutions, controls, etc). > > Since we have a Problem List persistent archetype that records > OBSERVATIONS about the health problems: > > - Would it be a good solution to use LINKs between those OBSERVATIONs and > the COMPOSITIONs related to those problems in order to solve the "query > COMPOSITIONS by health problem"? > > Is there another solution for this? What do you think? > > Thanks! > > -- > Kind regards, > Eng. Pablo Pazos Guti?rrez > http://cabolabs.com <http://cabolabs.com/es/home> > <http://twitter.com/ppazos> > > _______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing > list openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-clinical mailing list > openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org > > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20141228/27b1ef53/attachment.html>
