It is really problematic in most systems. First there are often more than one problem addressed. Second, a lot of them are trivial and one off and do not need to be on the problem list (more reason for encounter).
I like the idea of doing this with folders in openEHR. No need to link from the document so it can be done retrospectively. It can even be different for different users potentially. Cheers Sam Dr Sam Heard Chairman, openEHR Foundation From: pablo pazos Sent: ?Tuesday?, ?18? ?November? ?2014 ?1?:?04? ?PM To: For openEHR technical discussions, For openEHR clinical discussions Hi all, just re-sending this question on the clinical list too. I'm wondering how to handle the link between documents and health problems in a problem-oriented record. Thanks! -- Kind regards, Eng. Pablo Pazos Guti?rrez http://cabolabs.com From: [email protected] To: openehr-technical at lists.openehr.org Subject: Problem-oriented records and querying by problem Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 13:28:40 -0300 Hi, another question related to querying: I have a case of problem-oriented records, where I need to query all the COMPOSITIONS related to a specific problem (evolutions, controls, etc). Since we have a Problem List persistent archetype that records OBSERVATIONS about the health problems: - Would it be a good solution to use LINKs between those OBSERVATIONs and the COMPOSITIONs related to those problems in order to solve the "query COMPOSITIONS by health problem"? Is there another solution for this? What do you think? Thanks! -- Kind regards, Eng. Pablo Pazos Guti?rrez http://cabolabs.com _______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20141118/7ed0305f/attachment.html>
