Sure their model has issues but at least they've considered the core clinical process angle to inform their information model. Anyway if someone has their contact details suggest they drop them a line. Tony
On 24 January 2016 at 17:48, Thomas Beale <[email protected]> wrote: > > Without wanting to be too critical, not having read their work in detail, > they may not be experienced in health since they have not distinguished > Orders (what we call Instructions) from Actions performed, which is pretty > basic. Also they seem to treat Diagnosis as the main outcome /next step of > Observation, but as we all know a proper 'diagnosis' is just one of a > number of possible types of assessment. A lot of health orders and actions > occur before an actual diagnosis is made. > > - thomas > > On 24/01/2016 16:48, Tony Shannon wrote: > >> thanks Tom >> >> Have you contacted the authors to make them aware of openEHR? >> Seems like they've made a lot of effort ... >> Interestingly their Observe/Orient/Decide/Act model is in essence very >> similar to the same generic process model that underpins the openEHR >> reference model..Observations/Evaluations/Instructions/Actions.. >> So close and yet so far.. they need pointing to openEHR. >> >> regards, >> Tony >> > > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-clinical mailing list > [email protected] > > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org >
_______________________________________________ openEHR-clinical mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org
