I have looked at the CMAP approach in the past but I am not convinced that it adds much in our world, over standard mindmapping. It is certainly a little more flexible but not in any key respects.
The models are interesting and I agree are very similar philosophically to archetypes. The paper was published in 2012 and I was not able to found any further information on the True ERL project or avaialbility of the models. The lead author, Allen Brewer, https://www.linkedin.com/in/allen-brewer-74218111 seems to have been involved in IHE Eye Care. I will contact him and ask if the project is still active. Ian Dr Ian McNicoll mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859 office +44 (0)1536 414994 skype: ianmcnicoll email: [email protected] twitter: @ianmcnicoll Co-Chair, openEHR Foundation [email protected] Director, freshEHR Clinical Informatics Ltd. Director, HANDIHealth CIC Hon. Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL On 24 January 2016 at 21:32, Dr Evelyn Hovenga <[email protected]> wrote: > It's not surprising that they didn't know about openEHR, based on their > paper and listed references they don't appear to have done much of a > literature search. > > Evelyn > > -----Original Message----- > From: openEHR-clinical [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Thomas Beale > Sent: Monday, 25 January 2016 4:49 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: concept maps (Cmaps) for archetyping? > > > Without wanting to be too critical, not having read their work in detail, > they may not be experienced in health since they have not distinguished > Orders (what we call Instructions) from Actions performed, which is pretty > basic. Also they seem to treat Diagnosis as the main outcome /next step of > Observation, but as we all know a proper 'diagnosis' is just one of a > number > of possible types of assessment. A lot of health orders and actions occur > before an actual diagnosis is made. > > - thomas > > On 24/01/2016 16:48, Tony Shannon wrote: > > thanks Tom > > > > Have you contacted the authors to make them aware of openEHR? > > Seems like they've made a lot of effort ... > > Interestingly their Observe/Orient/Decide/Act model is in essence very > > similar to the same generic process model that underpins the openEHR > > reference model..Observations/Evaluations/Instructions/Actions.. > > So close and yet so far.. they need pointing to openEHR. > > > > regards, > > Tony > > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-clinical mailing list > [email protected] > > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org > > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-clinical mailing list > [email protected] > > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org >
_______________________________________________ openEHR-clinical mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org
