>> There is a specific flag on list for noting the clinically meaningful >> statement, but what we've found is that almost all systems treat the >> statement of no allergies in an allergy record as an explicit statement > > that sounds right. > >> Btw, I don't think that the statement of no allergy is a case of a negation >> statement > > Is there any online summary of how negations, exclusions etc are understood > in FHIR?
No, there's no summary at all. Our general approach is that the theory of negations from terminfo generally holds, but a thorough survey of what existing systems are doing (or, failing that, a series of connectathons) generally establishes that there are practical restrictions created by poor clinical record keeping that point to a different course of action. Also, we consider other approaches, including the openehr exclusion model approach, which is also a part of FHIR. Grahame > > - thomas > > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-clinical mailing list > openEHR-clinical@lists.openehr.org > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org _______________________________________________ openEHR-clinical mailing list openEHR-clinical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org
