Hi Thomas, This might help you: https://openehr.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/healthmod/pages/91139266/Implementing+Laboratory+Tests+in+openEHR
Heather From: openEHR-clinical [mailto:openehr-clinical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Beale Sent: Thursday, 13 July 2017 1:22 AM To: For openEHR clinical discussions <openehr-clinical@lists.openehr.org> Subject: Q: design description of lab archetypes Clinical modellers, I'm trying to work out the latest design of Lab archetypes. A Lab result seems to now be a structure like the following: · openEHR-EHR-OBSERVATION.laboratory_test_result o + at0097|Test findings|: openEHR-EHR-CLUSTER.laboratory_test_panel [*] § +at0002 |Laboratory Result|: CLUSTER [*] § +at0004 |Reference range guidance| § +at0005 |Result status| § +at0014 |Result Detail|: [open slot] - ? openEHR-EHR-CLUSTER.laboratory_test_analyte [*] § +at0001 |Analyte Result|: DATA_VALUE § +at0003 |Comment|: DV_TEXT § etc Questions · is this a correct understanding of the current design? · where would the LOINC code for each analyte go? · we could build some common test panels by specialising the test analyte archetype into things like TSH, TS4, etc and lab test panel into 'thyroid test' - is anyone doing this? · how does AQL querying work if LOINC is not in use / not available? It would be good if there was a design page on this e.g. in the openEHR wiki. thanks - thomas -- Thomas Beale Principal, Ars Semantica<http://www.arssemantica.com> Consultant, ABD Team, Intermountain Healthcare<https://intermountainhealthcare.org/> Management Board, Specifications Program Lead, openEHR Foundation<http://www.openehr.org> Chartered IT Professional Fellow, BCS, British Computer Society<http://www.bcs.org/category/6044> Health IT blog<http://wolandscat.net/> | Culture blog<http://wolandsothercat.net/>
_______________________________________________ openEHR-clinical mailing list openEHR-clinical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org