Hi I prefer modelling with specialized and small archetypes, this way I may choose to query across templates (contains [openEHR.EHR.OBSERVATION.whatever.v1]) or ask for the template/specific composition if the context is important.
So, your model method 1 does not exclude using queries method 2, but choosing modelling method 2 makes queries model 1 harder in my opinion. For this reason, I prefer model 1. Best regards Vennlig hilsen Lars Morgan Karlsen Seniorkonsulent DIPS ASA 8037 BODØ Mobil (+47) 900 54 284<tel:(+47)%20900%2054%20284> Tlf: (+47) 75 59 20 00<tel:(+47)%2075%2059%2020%2000> http://www.dips.no<http://www.dips.no/> Denne meldingen er bare ment for mottakeren, og kan inneholde fortrolige opplysninger eller annen privat informasjon. Hvis du mottar denne ved en feil, vær så vennlig å varsle avsender og slett meldingen. Fra: openEHR-clinical [mailto:[email protected]] På vegne av Pablo Pazos Sendt: tirsdag 26. september 2017 03:52 Til: For openEHR clinical discussions <[email protected]> Emne: Modeling generic concepts, considerations for querying Hi all, I'm working with the clinical synopsis archetype, using it to model very open psychotherapy notes. The difference of that archetype from, for instance, blood pressure, triage, problem/diagnosis, is these archetypes are more or less very specific concepts, while synopsis might be used in many contexts, by different specialties, to save different kinds of data. The synopsis itself is a very generic concept. Considering querying for a synopsis, I think queries should consider the context, not only the archetype id. For instance if I want the psychotherapy notes instead of other kinds of clinical synopsis, some extra data should be given in the query. I can see two ways of doing this, with more 1. specific archetypes or 2. using templates to filter the query results. 1. means the synopsis archetype might be specialized to synopsis-psychotherapy, so queries can use that new archetype id. 2. at the template level using the synopsis archetype, and the template is for psychotherapy. This implies the template id should be used on the query as context/filter. What alternative do clinical modelers see as more correct? I like specializing archetypes because we can keep queries simple, but we might end up with a lot of archetypes. Using templates makes queries more complex, but we don't need more archetypes for specializations. Thanks! PS: please let me know if this doesn't make sense :) -- Ing. Pablo Pazos Gutiérrez e: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> p: +598 99 043 145 skype: cabolabs [https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download&id=0B27lX-sxkymfdEdPLVI5UTZuZlU&revid=0B27lX-sxkymfcUwzT0N2RUs3bGU2UUovakc4VXBxWFZ6OXNnPQ]<http://cabolabs.com/> http://www.cabolabs.com<http://www.cabolabs.com/> https://cloudehrserver.com<https://cloudehrserver.com/> Subscribe to our newsletter<http://eepurl.com/b_w_tj>
_______________________________________________ openEHR-clinical mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org
